The requirements document
Scoped to your business goals, not copied from a template.
I take you through your marketing technology RFP — analytics, attribution, tag management, consent, media verification — with sharp requirements, a fair scoring grid, and a shortlist you can defend to procurement and the board. On your side of the table, vendor-neutral.
You buy once, correctly. The #1 cause of tech purchase regret is total cost running past the estimate; #2 is slow implementation (Gartner). Both get caught at the RFP stage — if you know what to ask. That’s exactly what goes into the requirements and the demo scripts.
You compare apples to apples. Vendor proposals are built to be incomparable. A scoring grid with criteria and weights agreed before the demos brings them all to the same denominator.
You negotiate informed. The vendor closes dozens of deals a year; you run an RFP every 2–3 years. That information asymmetry has a price. I reduce it with market benchmarks and the questions the vendor hopes you won’t ask.
The decision holds up. You get a written decision memo — why this tool, why not the others, with which risks — that you take to the board without sweating. And 18 months later, when someone asks “who picked this?”, the answer has documentation.
Your team comes out smarter. The grid, the requirements and the demo scripts stay with you, documented. Next selection, you reuse them — with or without me.
For marketing, e-commerce and product teams at mid-sized and large companies choosing a measurement technology.
An analytics platform, an attribution tool, tag management / CDP, a CMP, media verification.
I work for the buying team. I don’t write proposals for vendors, and I take commission from none of them.
Not “scalable enterprise-grade platform”, but: which business questions need answers, what data goes in, what reports come out, who uses them.
Criteria and weights agreed by the team before the first demo. The grid decides, not the last impression.
The vendor demonstrates on your cases — your data, your flows, your edge cases — not on their presentation dataset.
Three-year total cost (licence + implementation + training + maintenance), what happens to your data at exit, the limits you’d otherwise discover after signing.
With prepared questions, at real customers — not the three the vendor suggests.
Scoped to your business goals, not copied from a template.
Criteria, weights, scoring method — agreed with the team before the demos.
Who made it, who didn’t, and why.
Including the ones about total cost and what happens to your data at exit.
What to ask existing customers to learn what’s not in the slides.
The recommendation, the alternatives, the risks.
Write to us with what you’re selecting and where you are in the process. I’ll reply directly, with the steps I’d take in your place.